Biomass steam boilers are widely used in industries such as pharmaceuticals, paper-making, and food processing to provide the steam heat energy required for production. To achieve efficient and safe boiler operation, an advanced automation control system is essential. Currently, two main control solutions are used in the industrial sector: PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) control systems and DCS (Distributed Control System) control systems. These two systems differ in their architecture and application.
Differences Between PLC and DCS in Boiler Control
Control Characteristics: PLC typically adopts a centralized or modular architecture, with a single controller handling all I/O signals and executing predetermined logic or PID control. It has a fast response time, flexible programming, and is suitable for applications requiring high-speed logic control. However, traditional PLC systems operate independently, with each PLC having its own database, and multiple PLCs require additional communication and data mapping when working together. In contrast, DCS adopts a distributed architecture, connecting multiple controllers via a network and sharing a unified database and human-machine interface. DCS naturally supports complex process control and multi-loop coordination, providing a global monitoring and operating platform, especially suitable for continuous production processes like pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and paper-making.
Advantages Comparison: In process control scenarios such as boiler control, small biomass boilers often use PLC solutions, which are cost-effective, flexible in programming and adjustment, and easy to maintain. PLC hardware is modular and can quickly increase or decrease I/O modules as needed, making on-site modifications convenient. Additionally, PLC responds quickly, with control logic executing at the millisecond level, ensuring timely actions for boiler combustion, feedwater, and other interlocks. DCS is more suitable for large or complex boiler systems. The advantage of DCS lies in its high system integration and stability: it includes redundant design, a unified plant-wide historical database, and operation stations, allowing for long-term reliable operation and ease of integration with other units. In cases where precise control of multiple parameters and integration with overall plant management is required (such as the energy center boiler of a paper factory), DCS offers unmatched performance and reliability.
Disadvantages Comparison: The limitation of PLC is that as the system scale increases, data exchange and system expansion between multiple PLCs become more complex. Communication networks and software integration are required, and data from each control unit must be aggregated to the upper computer for unified management. Additionally, standard PLCs typically lack multi-level redundancy, and high availability usually requires selecting high-end models with redundant CPUs or networks. DCS has the disadvantage of high initial investment and system complexity. The DCS software and hardware are highly integrated, and installation and commissioning require support from vendor experts. The upfront cost and engineering workload are much higher than PLC. Additionally, DCS is less flexible for upgrades or modifications, and in cases where frequent changes are required, adjustments to DCS can be costly. Therefore, for small-scale boiler projects that require frequent modifications, the heavy investment in DCS may not be worthwhile, and PLC could be more practical.
Next, we will compare PLC and DCS performance in biomass boiler control across several key dimensions.
Key Comparison Dimensions
Initial Investment Cost
In terms of initial investment, PLC solutions are generally lower in cost. PLC controllers and their I/O modules are relatively affordable, and the associated software licensing fees are also low. Additionally, system design and installation commissioning are relatively simple, requiring fewer human resources, making PLC the preferred choice for many small and medium-sized boiler automation projects. In contrast, DCS solutions have higher initial investments. A DCS system includes control stations, operation stations, network, engineering software, and hardware, making it costly. In addition, vendors usually recommend redundancy for reliability, further increasing the initial investment. However, for large biomass boilers or combined heat and power (CHP) projects, the benefits provided by DCS (such as better combustion control and reduced downtime) often offset the high initial cost. In summary, small projects lean toward PLC to save on capital expenditure, while large projects may be willing to pay for the long-term benefits of DCS.
Operational and Maintenance Complexity
In terms of operation and maintenance, PLC systems are relatively simple and user-friendly. PLC configuration and programming are straightforward, and general electrical or automation engineers can master them with training. Common control logic in boiler operations (such as fan start/stop, feedwater interlock) can be implemented using PLC ladder diagrams or function blocks. Replacing PLC modules or modifying control programs is also relatively easy. Therefore, during daily operation, PLC systems have low maintenance requirements and are easy to operate. DCS systems are more complex. A complete DCS often uses a multi-layer network architecture, including operation station servers, historical databases, and other modules. Maintenance personnel need to be proficient in specialized software tools and system knowledge. Adjusting parameters or upgrading DCS typically requires vendor or professional team support. Additionally, because DCS is highly integrated, replacing or upgrading certain parts may affect the entire system, requiring careful maintenance. However, in practice, DCS provides a unified human-machine interface and rich diagnostic information, improving the convenience and safety of operation management. In summary, PLC is better suited for smaller boiler systems with fewer operators, while DCS is more appropriate for large boilers monitored by dedicated control rooms, despite its increased maintenance complexity.
Fault Recovery Ability
System reliability and fault recovery ability are crucial for continuous operation equipment such as boilers. Traditionally, DCS is considered to have better redundancy and fault tolerance, but modern PLCs have made significant progress in this regard. For PLC systems, many manufacturers offer PLC models that support redundant CPUs, allowing for hot standby with a primary and backup controller. Remote I/O systems can also use redundant buses and dual power supplies to ensure redundancy in key signals. These features allow PLC systems to construct high-availability architectures, avoiding control interruptions due to single-point hardware failures. Of course, mid- to low-end PLCs typically do not have redundancy by default and must be upgraded or supplemented with redundancy modules to enhance fault tolerance. In DCS systems, redundancy design is almost standard. Typical DCS setups use dual-redundant controllers, dual Ethernet ring communication, and redundant historical database servers. When a component fails, the backup component seamlessly takes over, ensuring uninterrupted boiler control. This multi-layer redundancy provides high stability for major continuous production processes. In summary, for small boilers requiring high reliability, a redundant PLC system or additional hardware backup can be selected; for large boilers to prevent downtime, the fault recovery mechanism of DCS offers greater advantages.
System Expandability
Expandability determines the system's ability to adapt to future needs. PLC systems are flexible in expansion; within a certain scale, I/O modules can be added, and CPU performance can be upgraded to meet more measurement points or new functional requirements. When a single PLC's capacity is insufficient, other PLCs of the same series can be added and communicate via industrial networks to achieve multi-PLC coordination. However, when multiple PLCs are integrated into a network, control data needs to be transmitted between controllers, and information from each PLC's database is not shared automatically; it must be integrated via the upper computer or communication program. Therefore, as the system expands, the integration workload and complexity increase. PLC is better suited for medium-scale applications with limited future changes. DCS is designed for large-scale systems, and it can easily manage thousands of I/O points and more. When a boiler system adds auxiliary machines or measurement points, only I/O cards or control stations need to be added to the DCS, and the data will automatically be included in the global database for monitoring and analysis. For complex production lines, DCS adapts well to system growth. However, DCS upgrades or the addition of new stations can incur high license fees and professional implementation costs, making large-scale expansion a "system engineering." In conclusion, PLC is more suitable for applications that require frequent small adjustments, while DCS is ideal for large-scale projects where a unified system can be deployed in one go, with minimal impact from small changes.
MES/ERP System Integration Capability
Modern factories require control systems to integrate with Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems for optimized production scheduling and management. DCS has historically been considered easier to integrate with upper-level systems because DCS has a unified database and communication interface, making it easy to provide full-plant process data to MES/ERP. Many DCS manufacturers offer standard OPC interfaces, historical data servers, or even their own MES modules to make boiler operation data (such as steam output, fuel consumption) easily accessible for management decisions. However, PLCs can also achieve similar integration via SCADA. Modern SCADA software can collect real-time data from multiple PLCs, acting as a data aggregation and monitoring hub, and then pass the information to MES/ERP through OPC UA or database interfaces. In fact, PLC+SCADA solutions now have comparable vertical integration capabilities to DCS, and due to the use of open communication standards, integration costs may be lower (many open-source SCADA platforms do not require additional interface licensing fees). For example, a food processing company's boiler PLC control system can upload steam pressure, temperature, etc., to MES via an OPC server, optimizing energy scheduling in conjunction with production line data. Similarly, a paper factory's boiler DCS system can directly integrate with MES, providing real-time feedback of steam supply to the production management system. Overall, DCS has more integration cases with enterprise systems, but PLC solutions can also effectively integrate with MES/ERP by selecting the right software tools.
PLC vs DCS Control Solution Comparison Table
The table below summarizes the differences between PLC and DCS solutions in the key parameters mentioned above:
.png)
(Note: The differences listed in the table are general, and the specific performance of different brands and models may vary in individual projects.)
Mainstream Brand Performance in Different Scenarios
In the domestic industrial control market, Siemens and HollySys are the two main control system suppliers in the boiler control field. Both have mature products in PLC and DCS, but each has its advantages in different application scenarios.
Small-Scale Boilers (Single Boiler Control or Simple Boiler Room): These scenarios are commonly seen in food processing plants, general manufacturing workshops, or single pharmaceutical factories, where the boiler scale is small and the control loops are limited. Users typically prefer Siemens PLC solutions. Siemens' SIMATIC PLC series is known for its stable performance and ease of use, with a large application base in China. For example, a dairy factory configured a Siemens S7-1500 PLC and WinCC configuration software to implement one-button start/stop, automatic steam pressure adjustment, and remote monitoring. The PLC control system's quick response ensures precise control of the boiler's steam pressure and prevents human error through interlocking with the production line. In terms of maintenance, this system can be directly managed by the factory's electricians, and spare parts and technical support are easily available. Another example from the pharmaceutical industry shows that boiler supplier "Kai Da Steam Source" equipped the pharmaceutical plant's boiler with a Siemens fully automated control system, realizing unmanned operation and significantly reducing labor costs. In cost-sensitive environments seeking easy operation, Siemens PLC systems offer high cost performance and reliability.
Large Boilers or Energy Stations (Multiple Boilers and Complex Systems): Paper mills, large pharmaceutical bases, self-supplied thermal power plants, and other large-scale facilities typically operate biomass boiler systems with large capacities. These systems may include multi-boiler coordination, waste heat recovery, and other complex processes. In such scenarios, DCS solutions from vendors like HollySys are more advantageous. HollySys, a well-known DCS supplier in China, has mature systems and has successfully implemented hundreds of DCS projects in the power, chemical, and paper-making industries. For example, when upgrading the control of the 2×150 tons per hour biomass boiler group for Yueyang Lin Paper Group, HollySys' HOLLiAS DCS system was used. After the upgrade, the DCS integrated the boiler's combustion, feedwater, steam pressure, and other parameters with the plant's MES system, achieving seamless communication between production scheduling and real-time control data. The DCS application made the paper mill's boiler operation more stable, and operators could monitor the status of each boiler via dynamic graphics and trend analysis on the central control room's screen. Another case in large food processing energy stations shows that HollySys DCS manages multiple biomass boilers and heating networks centrally, using advanced control algorithms to optimize load distribution and provide fault interlock protection. These examples indicate that in large-scale and complex systems, DCS solutions like HollySys excel at integration and reliability, providing users with an "integrated" boiler control solution.
It should be noted that Siemens and HollySys are not mutually exclusive: Siemens offers process control systems (such as PCS 7/Neo DCS) in addition to PLCs, typically used in large pharmaceutical and chemical plants. HollySys, aside from DCS, has also developed its own PLC products (such as the LM series), used in equipment manufacturing and other fields. In actual projects, both companies provide the optimal solution based on user needs. In the pharmaceutical industry, some enterprises choose Siemens PCS series "small DCS" systems to meet GMP data integrity requirements. In mid-sized paper mills, there are also examples where HollySys uses compact DCS or PLC to control single boilers.
Industry Case Analysis
To better understand the effectiveness of PLC or DCS solutions in specific industries, we now analyze typical scenarios from pharmaceuticals, paper-making, and food industries.
Pharmaceutical Industry Case: A biopharmaceutical factory needed to retrofit its coal-fired boiler to a biomass boiler and automate the control system to meet environmental and pharmaceutical production standards. After evaluation, the factory selected a PLC + touchscreen control solution. During implementation, engineers used Siemens PLC to automatically adjust the boiler's feed, fan, furnace temperature, and steam pressure, and set multi-level interlock protection. During debugging, advanced control algorithms were introduced to optimize combustion, allowing the boiler to automatically control feeding and air distribution based on steam load, improving combustion efficiency. After the retrofit, the boiler achieved "unmanned operation" mode: operators only need to monitor the system from the control room, with PLCs automatically alerting and locking out in case of abnormal conditions. This greatly enhanced safety. The boiler's thermal efficiency improved by 10%, fuel costs were reduced by several hundred thousand RMB annually, and labor costs were drastically reduced, with boiler room staff reduced from four to one person.
Paper Industry Case: A large paper group upgraded its self-supplied power station's boiler system automation. The system includes two biomass steam boilers and a matching steam turbine. The original control system had aged and could not meet the increasingly refined production management requirements. The group ultimately chose HollySys DCS for a comprehensive upgrade. The new system was configured with dual-redundant DCS controllers for each boiler's fuel delivery, combustion control, water level and steam pressure control, as well as coordination of auxiliary systems. Through the DCS platform, the data from both boilers was integrated into the plant-level real-time database and linked with the energy management MES. After the upgrade, operators could monitor boiler and turbine performance curves on the control room's screen and adjust combustion parameters according to load demand. The DCS' advanced control functions, like model predictive control and expert alarm diagnostics, helped maintain optimal combustion efficiency and identify potential issues in a timely manner. After the upgrade, the boiler's thermal efficiency increased by 5 percentage points, steam quality became more stable, and unplanned downtime was significantly reduced. Moreover, by integrating DCS with MES, the feedback of steam demand from the paper production line could be immediately fed back to the boiler control system, achieving precise matching of production pace and energy supply.
Food Industry Case: A food processing park uses biomass boilers to provide centralized heating for multiple factories. Due to large fluctuations in steam demand and difficulty in manual coordination, the park decided to upgrade its boiler control system. The project used the "PLC centralized control + SCADA monitoring" solution. Each of the three biomass steam boilers in the boiler room was equipped with a Schneider PLC, with local control of feeding and combustion, and a SCADA system for centralized monitoring and dispatching. SCADA dynamically determined the number of boilers to be operated and load distribution based on the park's total steam demand and sent commands to the PLCs through Ethernet. The control strategy introduced master-slave control mode: one boiler maintains constant pressure steam supply, while other boilers automatically load or unload based on pressure deviation. The upgraded system ensured constant steam pressure control, responding promptly to changes in steam demand without significant pressure fluctuations. Additionally, SCADA uploaded boiler operating data to the enterprise ERP system, enabling remote monitoring of steam production and fuel consumption, used for energy cost accounting and optimization. The upgraded system showed an 8% improvement in boiler thermal efficiency, with steam pressure compliance rate exceeding 99%. The PLC + SCADA system in multi-boiler control and energy management was highly flexible and met the food industry's high demand for stable steam supply and energy saving.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there is no absolute advantage or disadvantage when choosing a control system for biomass boilers; it depends on applicability. For projects with small-scale boilers, simple control loops, and limited investment budgets, PLC solutions, with their low cost, ease of implementation, and flexible scalability, are often the best choice. They can meet most basic control needs and can be upgraded to enhance functionality as needed. For large-scale boiler systems or continuous production processes with high reliability requirements, DCS solutions offer comprehensive integration, redundancy, and centralized management capabilities, making them more attractive. Despite the higher initial investment, DCS can improve operational efficiency and management capabilities in complex scenarios, offering good returns in the long run. It is worth noting that with the continuous development of PLC and DCS technology, many modern control systems now combine the advantages of both in a single platform. The future of boiler control may see more "hybrid" solutions, such as small DCS or PLCs with process functionality, to more flexibly meet the demands of different scales and industries. For decision-makers, the best practice is to assess based on industry characteristics and project scale, referencing the key dimensions mentioned above, and choose a solution from a reputable mainstream brand. Whether PLC or DCS is chosen, ensuring system adaptation to process needs, providing expansion space, and considering cost-effectiveness are essential for realizing stable and efficient biomass boiler operation, ultimately creating long-term value for enterprises.
As a team specializing in boiler automation control, Henan Rentai is dedicated to providing tailored intelligent control solutions to ensure every boiler runs worry-free, cost-effectively, and reliably. For more information, please contact Henan Rentai Electric: Phone: 17638563962 / 0371-56520104 Email: info@hnrentai.com.